Re: Pings

From: John Matus (John.Matus@tokiom.com)
Date: Mon Dec 12 2005 - 18:58:03 GMT-3

Next message: John Matus: "Re: Frame Relay token bucket"
Previous message: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Pings"
Maybe in reply to: Nadeem Zahid \(iszahid\): "Pings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

in this case you should ask the proctor what he/they expect for
connectivity.....they will tell you what should be reachable.

Regards,

John D. Matus
Technical Support / PAS
Fujitsu Consulting
626-568-7716
John.Matus@tokiom.com

             "Nadeem Zahid
             \(iszahid\)"
             <iszahid@cisco.co To
             m> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
             Sent by: cc
             nobody@groupstudy
             .com Subject
                                       Pings

             12/12/2005 01:18
             PM


             Please respond to
               "Nadeem Zahid
               \(iszahid\)"
             <iszahid@cisco.co
                    m>

I'm running the script to verify that I can reach all prefixes in the
topology at the end of the lab.
There are always few subnets that were not advertised into any IGP and
hence fail.
Can we/should we use "redistribute connected" to make them reachable in
the lab or it will
be considered bad move?

Nadeem

Next message: John Matus: "Re: Frame Relay token bucket"
Previous message: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Pings"
Maybe in reply to: Nadeem Zahid \(iszahid\): "Pings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:51 GMT-3