From: Julius Kinsler (jkinsler@harbortech.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 18:48:14 ART
Ive seen typos as well that I've lost time on, I wonder now if that's
actually part of the lab and its on purpose. Where they want you to
engage the proctor..
Julius
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Roberto Fernandez
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:49 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Talking about typos on the exam questionnaire
Friends,
On my second attempt (failed) I faced one typo, it took me some time
(not an hour) to go to the proctor and confirm. It was not spelling or
grammar; it was like an addition of a number on a command output where
it couldn't possible be. But being the CCIE Lab, you always trust more
on the test than in yourself...this time I was right, but it cost me
some time. (Anyway those 15 or 30 minutes wouldn't have make any
difference)
Best Regards,
Roberto
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Godswill Oletu
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:32 PM
To: dfredrick@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Still waiting on Results from Friday
Rick,
I can feel you men, hang in there.
Lets be serious, without breaking the NDA, can you share more light on
the kind of typos? It is forgiving if the typos are spelling errors, or
some
grammer related terms that will not affect one's understanding or
solution.
However, if the typos will influence how someone intepretes or approach
a particular task, then it will be highly unfair and Cisco should have
caught it before releasing the lab to their centre.
Thanks.
Godswill Oletu
----- Original Message -----
From: <dfredrick@gmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: Still waiting on Results from Friday
> Man... it's 2pm... and still no results... What the longest someone
has
> had to wait for the results. You think's because I had two typos? And
> since it took me an hour to convince the proctor that they were
typos...
> it's taking them a bit to figure out their mistakes?
>
> Do you think that this should be grounds for a refund... (the typos)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART