From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2007 - 23:29:43 ART
Maybe a more accurate statement is if that multipoint configuration is done
directly under the physical interface, then ip split horizon is disabled,
otherwise the IP split horizon is enabled (If a multipoint sub-interface is
used).
On 2/20/07, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> IP split horizon is automatically disabled on multipoint
> Frame-relay anyway.
>
> On 2/20/07, Ridney Laudiano <ridneylaudiano@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Split-horizon is for distance vector protocols, ospf is a link-state
> > protocol that builds topology databases through lsa's so no, you don't
> > need
> > it.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > huangyinxiao@gmail.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 9:04 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Split horizon on multipoint physical interface
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have a question on multipoint physical interface. If R1 is a spoken
> > router in hub-spoken structure in frame-relay, do I need to issue the
> > command 'no split horizon' to let ospf routes to go across the frame
> > relay?
> > Or mulitipoint physical interface defaultly can pass ospf routes without
> > 'no
> > split horizon'?
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Laurence
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> CCSI# 30832
> Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor)
> www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832 Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor) www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:47 ART