From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Tue Jan 13 2009 - 14:47:50 ARST
We actually like to do longer prefixes known via mpls and less specific ones
know via the dmvpn...
So 10.1.10.0/24 would be learned on mpls while
10.1.0.0/16 would be learned (as the backup) on dmvpn
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Fake
Name
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:00 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: DMVPN question
If I want to use dmvpn to be a backup for the already existing mpls network
where each location has a connection to the internet and mpls connections to
eachother what is the best practice? Would it be configuring dmvpn and
using the same routing protocol instance between everything and playing with
the metrics to make sure traffic is going over the mpls network and not the
dmvpn when its up and when it does down to use the dmvpn backup? Or would
it be using another routing protocol for the dmvpn network with a higher
administrative distance so that routes dont go in the table till the mpls
network is down?
Please offer some advice on best practices?
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:37 ARST