RE: any one looking for CCIE #

Now a days just giving your number wont cut it. We just completed a Gold
Audit with Cisco. For the CCIE portion, we had to include a number of HR
items like payroll, taxes, ect to prove the CCIE really worked for us.

Howard

 
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
George Roman
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:49 AM
To: Dale Shaw
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: any one looking for CCIE #

100% agree with you.
It should be considered a fraud.

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Danshtr <danshtr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://www.ccieflyer.com/2009-Mar-Monica-Cojocneanu.php
>
> Sorry, I had to stop once I noticed that neither the interviewer or
> the interviewee knew the difference between "loose" and "lose".
>
> I can only hope it was a transcribed phone interview.
>
> Back on topic, I view people with such fraudulent CCIE # associations
> as dishonest and greedy. It doesn't reflect well on your character at
> all. The rules are plain as day -- the partner requirements are there
> so ensure partner organisations can deliver a specified level of
> service. If that organisation has attained Silver or Gold status
> through fraudulent CCIE # associations, how well do you think they'll
> be doing in the marketplace? How successful will their projects be?
>
> How will it look when the a legitimate recruiter or prospective
> employer discovers you're associated with a shady partner
> organisation? What message does it send?
>
> My advice to you all is to carefully weigh up your options before
> getting blinded by the dollar signs. Discussing it on a public forum
> is pretty stupid, too, I might add.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 18:19:40 ART