Re: Strange status of EtherChannel!

I have never seen or noticed that status before doing labs or even at
work. Not even on the doc cd
I find the open ended questions very discouraging. If you happen to get 2
that you do not know or even worse you misunderstand what they want from
you, you lose $1400 + expenses. I pay for everything out of my pocket. I
study very hard. I stay up until my eyes burn and my head throbs. I hear of
all the people who fail because of these questions and think do I want to
risk $1400+ on 4 questions. $1400 for some company sending employees for a
test can absorb this expense. I can not. At least multiple choice would
give you a fighting chance to guess correctly or start the old brain
thinking. What's to say the live person reading your questions agree's with
how you presented it. These are scored in different countries where you take
the test.

What will people say" well you were not ready" and the folks who pass will
say "this should not be an issue for a well prepared engineer". BS I tell
you!!!!!! You just got lucky and got easy questions questions and deep down
you know it. There are MANY well prepared engineers who got screwed over.
Cisco has done a GREAT disservice to the average joe.

So now I need to spend more money for training, go to more bootcamps and for
what they do not teach this anyway. The quizzers are not relevant. Reread my
books and then forget my obscure hands on and vise versa.

 The 4 questions are not fair and should be removed.

This makes me very sad and fills me with discouragement. You do not
understand what I have sacrificed, I have scarified what I can never ever
get back, ever and I am not talking about time. What my family has
sacrificed. Oh no, what have I done. I am really very depressed now.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:28 AM, But Nicky <lyredhair_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> SW2(config)#do sh eth summ
> Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
> I - stand-alone s - suspended
> H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
> R - Layer3 S - Layer2
> U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregato
> U - unsuitable for bundling
> W - waiting to be aggregated
> D - default port
> Number of channel-groups in use: 1
> Number of aggregators: 1
> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
>
> ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
>
> 12 Po12(SU) - Fa0/19(P) Fa0/20(P) Fa0/21(P) Fa0/22(P)
> Fa0/23() Fa0/24(P) Fa0/25P)
> Fa0/26(P)
>
>
> Each interface are shown as (P), except F0/23 (),What is the status of
> F0/23? I have not saw it before, please help.
>
> Many thanks,
> But Nguyen.
>
> P/S: This is question for OEQ, which I collected from internet, do not
> require posting the configuration.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
-
"The more I learn the less I know". This is incredibly frustrating to me.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net