Hello,
Thanks for your replies Guys.
I have now worked out what the problem was: I had configured the native VLAN
on the trunks as an unused VLAN to prevent VLAN hopping but I had not
actually configured the VLAN on the switches at each end of the trunks. Once
I did this the CPU utilization went right down:
CPU utilization for five seconds: 6%/0%; one minute: 5%; five minutes: 5%
 PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
 319        6250      1492       4189  0.47%  0.03%  0.18%   5 SSH
Process
   4      371297     32106      11564  0.47%  0.11%  0.11%   0 Check
heaps
 191      188562    442160        426  0.31%  0.08%  0.05%   0 IP
Input
  92     1081515   1783874        606  0.15%  0.01%  0.00%   0 hpm main
process
   5          74      1025         72  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%   0 Pool
Manager
The reason I configured it this way is that I had done so before but only
between switches and ESX hosts without any issues.
In this case the switch was performing fine: routing, spanning-tree etc. but
obviously I was concerned about the high CPU usage.
Thanks again for your replies
Jezz
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:37 PM, <istong_at_stong.org> wrote:
>
> Any spanning tree issues going on?  What's the output from
> show spanning, etc
> Are you using vtp?
>
> Ian
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am seeing very high CPU utilization on a stack of 2 x
> > 3750s:
> >
> > CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/14%; one minute: 99%
> > ; five minutes: 99%
> >  PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min
> > TTY Process
> >  270   167303594    789523     211909 77.53% 79.32% 79.49%
> >   0 VLAN Manager
> >
> >  200     1108075    875272       1265  0.62%  0.57%  0.56%
> >   0 Spanning Tree
> >   36      122992      4860      25306  0.46%  0.05%  0.00%
> >   0 Per-minute Jobs
> >   96      245844    341634        719  0.30%  0.11%  0.12%
> >   0 hpm counter proc
> >    4      360969     31240      11554  0.30%  0.13%  0.11%
> >   0 Check heaps
> >
> > The VLAN Manager process appears to be the culprit using
> > approx 79% - does anyone have any idea why this might be
> > happening ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jezz
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > _____________ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Bigger.  Stronger.  Faster.
> Sign up for a New Free Email Account at http://MyEmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jan 22 2011 - 22:29:58 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART