There is no problem, I just don't understand enough about it to understand
how it is possible and I am curious.  I wonder how the data encoding is
separated from the power.  Reading about PAM-5 modulation used on
GigabitEthernet over UTP right now, and it is quite fascinating
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:
> POE uses the same wires for data and power in 100Base-T,
> what's the problem ?
>
>
> Joe Astorino @ 31/07/2011 15:47 -0300 dixit:
>
>> If all 4 pairs are used in 1000Base-T I wonder how POE also rolls into
>> that...
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar<mailto:
>> tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>>
>>    On 1G 1000BASE-T, pairs are bidirectional, full duplex.
>>    (Like your POTS phone line, you can talk while you listen)
>>    No collisions.
>>    Signal treatment is beyong my current understanding, but it uses 5
>>    levels in each pair!
>>    Amazing...
>>
>>
>>    Irfan Sid @ 31/07/2011 11:32 -0300 dixit:
>>
>>                 On  1 Gig link pin 4,5, 7 and 8  are bi-directional
>> meaning the
>>        same wire will be used for Tx and Rx?
>>         And  for 10/100 those pins  are not used at all, so 10/100 is
>>        serial rather then parrallel.
>>         Does that mean that odd collison is possible on both since they
>>        are bidirectional packet streams??
>>
>>                 http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-__**pinout.html<http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-__pinout.html>
>>        <http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-**pinout.html<http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-pinout.html>
>> >
>>
>>                 http://pinouts.ru/Net/__**Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml<http://pinouts.ru/Net/__Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml>
>>        <http://pinouts.ru/Net/**Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml<http://pinouts.ru/Net/Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>        On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
>>        <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
>>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>> wrote:
>>
>>           I stand corrected, in 1000BASE-T there are 4 bidirectional
>>        signal paths,
>>           so it's basically a parallel interface.
>>
>>           Sorry about that.
>>           -Carlos
>>
>>           Aaron Riemer @ 31/07/2011 05:36 -0300 dixit:
>>
>>               Yep. However just doing some reading it looks like
>>        Gigabit copper
>>               (1000BaseT) uses all four pairs and this link seems to
>>        suggest
>>               that data is
>>               sent in parallel.
>>                      http://www.cisco.com/en/US/___**
>> _tech/tk389/tk214/tech_____**digest09186a0080091a86.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/____tech/tk389/tk214/tech_____digest09186a0080091a86.html>
>>        <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__**tech/tk389/tk214/tech___**
>> digest09186a0080091a86.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__tech/tk389/tk214/tech___digest09186a0080091a86.html>
>> >
>>                      <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__**
>> tech/tk389/tk214/tech___**digest09186a0080091a86.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__tech/tk389/tk214/tech___digest09186a0080091a86.html>
>>        <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/**tech/tk389/tk214/tech_**
>> digest09186a0080091a86.html<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/tech_digest09186a0080091a86.html>
>> >>
>>
>>               "1000BASE-T works by using all four of the Category 5
>>        pairs to
>>               achieve 1000
>>               Mbps operation over the installed Category 5 copper cabling.
>>               1000 Mbps data
>>               rates are achieved by sending and receiving a 250 Mbps data
>>               stream over each
>>               of the four pairs simultaneously (4 X 250 Mbps = 1 Gbps)."
>>
>>
>>
>>               Cheers,
>>
>>               -Aaron.
>>
>>
>>
>>               -----Original Message-----
>>               From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>
>>               [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>__] On
>>
>>               Behalf Of
>>               Irfan Sid
>>               Sent: Sunday, 31 July 2011 1:02 PM
>>               To: Aaron Riemer
>>               Cc: Carlos G Mendioroz; Cisco certification; Cisco
>>        certification
>>               Subject: Re: Packet delivery on a Ethernet Wire
>>
>>               So does that mean that in copper wire, you have two paths ie
>>               full duplex,
>>               one for transmit and one for recieve. One pair of the
>>        copper will be
>>               dedicated to tansmit and one to recieve. Each path
>>        transmitting
>>               serially.
>>
>>               On Fibre its the same, you have two fibre's one for
>>        transmit and
>>               one for
>>               receive and data is transmitted serially on them.
>>
>>               Is this correct?
>>
>>               On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Aaron Riemer
>>               <ariemer_at_amnet.net.au <mailto:ariemer_at_amnet.net.au>
>>        <mailto:ariemer_at_amnet.net.au <mailto:ariemer_at_amnet.net.au>>**>
>> wrote:
>>
>>                   My apologies. I must have misread.
>>
>>                   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_**___Data_transmission<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/____Data_transmission>
>>        <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**__Data_transmission<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Data_transmission>
>> >
>>                   <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**__Data_transmission<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Data_transmission>
>>        <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Data_transmission<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_transmission>
>> >>
>>
>>                   Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>>                   Cheers,
>>
>>                   -Aaron.
>>
>>                   -----Original Message-----
>>                   From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>
>>                   [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
>>
>>                   <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>__] On Behalf Of
>>                   Carlos G Mendioroz
>>                   Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 12:27 AM
>>                   To: Aaron Riemer
>>                   Cc: 'Irfan Sid'; 'Cisco certification'; 'Cisco
>>        certification'
>>                   Subject: Re: Packet delivery on a Ethernet Wire
>>
>>                   Aaron,
>>                   copper has "pairs" because you use one wire as a
>>        reference
>>                   to the other.
>>                   But there is only one signal path (each way), and it
>>        works
>>                   serially.
>>                   -Carlos
>>
>>                   Aaron Riemer @ 27/7/2011 4:09 -0300 dixit:
>>
>>                       Hi Irfan,
>>
>>                       I believe with copper Ethernet (100BaseTX for
>>        example)
>>                       since there are
>>                       copper "pairs" the data is sent in parallel. I would
>>                       assume the only way
>>                       parallel data transmission would work with fibre
>>        is if a
>>                       different band
>>
>>                   of
>>
>>                       light is used (CWDM for example).
>>
>>                       Queuing on the router/switch only affects packets
>>        within
>>                       the router
>>
>>                   itself
>>
>>                       and has no bearing on packets along the wire (unless
>>                       they are dropped).
>>
>>                       Tools such as compression / LFI / DSCP marking are
>>                       examples of the
>>
>>               router
>>
>>                       manipulating the packets in some way before
>>        transmission
>>                       out an
>>
>>                   interface.
>>
>>                       Cheers,
>>
>>                       -Aaron.
>>
>>
>>                       -----Original Message-----
>>                       From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
>>                       <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>
>>                       [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
>>
>>                       <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
>>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>__] On Behalf Of
>>                       Irfan Sid
>>                       Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2011 1:48 PM
>>                       To: Cisco certification; Cisco certification
>>                       Subject: Packet delivery on a Ethernet Wire
>>
>>                       This maybe a stupid question would appreciate if
>>        someone
>>                       can clearify:
>>
>>                       Are Ethernet packets delivered serially on the
>>        physcial
>>                       medium ie copper
>>
>>                   or
>>
>>                       fibre - one after another in one single file or
>>        line if
>>                       you will. Or are
>>                       they delivered in parallel ie. two or more
>>        packets can be in
>>
>>               transmission
>>
>>                       along each other in parallel.
>>
>>                       Also when you enable queueing on  Router/switch.
>> Does
>>                       this only effect
>>
>>                   the
>>
>>                       behaviour of how the router treats the packet on the
>>                       inbound or outbound
>>                       interface or does it also effect the behaviour of
>> the
>>                       packet when it is
>>                       actually in transit on the wire itself.
>>
>>
>>                       Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>                       <http://www.ccie.net/>
>>
>>                              ______________________________**
>> ______________________________**___________________
>>                       Subscription information may be found at:
>>                       http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>> >
>>                       <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>                       Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>                       <http://www.ccie.net/>
>>
>>                              ______________________________**
>> ______________________________**___________________
>>                       Subscription information may be found at:
>>                       http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>> >
>>                       <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                   --
>>                   Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
>>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
>>                   <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>>
>>
>>         LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>
>>
>>
>>                   Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>                   <http://www.ccie.net/>
>>
>>                          ______________________________**
>> ______________________________**___________________
>>                   Subscription information may be found at:
>>                   http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>> >
>>                   <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>>               Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>               <http://www.ccie.net/>
>>
>>                      ______________________________**
>> ______________________________**___________________
>>               Subscription information may be found at:
>>               http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>> >
>>               <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>           --     Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
>>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
>>
>>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>>
>>            LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>
>>
>>
>>    --     Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
>> >>
>>
>>     LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>
>>
>>    Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>>    ______________________________**______________________________**
>> _______________
>>    Subscription information may be found at:
>>    http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
>>    <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Joe Astorino
>> CCIE #24347
>> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
>>
>> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
>
-- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Jul 31 2011 - 15:13:53 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 01 2011 - 06:30:06 ART