Joe,
Have a look at the following link:
http://pinouts.ru/Net/poe_pinout.shtml
There is a Wiring Certification just like CCIE it's called BICSI, if you are
interested get one of their courseware and go through it, you will learn a
ridiculous amount of stuff, from pinouts all the way to wiring design.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> There is no problem, I just don't understand enough about it to understand
> how it is possible and I am curious.  I wonder how the data encoding is
> separated from the power.  Reading about PAM-5 modulation used on
> GigabitEthernet over UTP right now, and it is quite fascinating
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> >wrote:
>
> > POE uses the same wires for data and power in 100Base-T,
> > what's the problem ?
> >
> >
> > Joe Astorino @ 31/07/2011 15:47 -0300 dixit:
> >
> >> If all 4 pairs are used in 1000Base-T I wonder how POE also rolls into
> >> that...
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> <mailto:
> >> tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
> >>
> >>    On 1G 1000BASE-T, pairs are bidirectional, full duplex.
> >>    (Like your POTS phone line, you can talk while you listen)
> >>    No collisions.
> >>    Signal treatment is beyong my current understanding, but it uses 5
> >>    levels in each pair!
> >>    Amazing...
> >>
> >>
> >>    Irfan Sid @ 31/07/2011 11:32 -0300 dixit:
> >>
> >>                 On  1 Gig link pin 4,5, 7 and 8  are bi-directional
> >> meaning the
> >>        same wire will be used for Tx and Rx?
> >>         And  for 10/100 those pins  are not used at all, so 10/100 is
> >>        serial rather then parrallel.
> >>         Does that mean that odd collison is possible on both since they
> >>        are bidirectional packet streams??
> >>
> >>                 http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-__**pinout.html<
> http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-__pinout.html>
> >>        <http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-**pinout.html<
> http://pinouts.ws/rj-45-pinout.html>
> >> >
> >>
> >>                 http://pinouts.ru/Net/__**Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml<
> http://pinouts.ru/Net/__Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml>
> >>        <http://pinouts.ru/Net/**Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml<
> http://pinouts.ru/Net/Ethernet10BaseT_pinout.shtml>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>        On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
> >>        <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> >>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>> wrote:
> >>
> >>           I stand corrected, in 1000BASE-T there are 4 bidirectional
> >>        signal paths,
> >>           so it's basically a parallel interface.
> >>
> >>           Sorry about that.
> >>           -Carlos
> >>
> >>           Aaron Riemer @ 31/07/2011 05:36 -0300 dixit:
> >>
> >>               Yep. However just doing some reading it looks like
> >>        Gigabit copper
> >>               (1000BaseT) uses all four pairs and this link seems to
> >>        suggest
> >>               that data is
> >>               sent in parallel.
> >>                      http://www.cisco.com/en/US/___**
> >> _tech/tk389/tk214/tech_____**digest09186a0080091a86.html<
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/____tech/tk389/tk214/tech_____digest09186a0080091a86.html
> >
> >>        <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__**tech/tk389/tk214/tech___**
> >> digest09186a0080091a86.html<
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__tech/tk389/tk214/tech___digest09186a0080091a86.html
> >
> >> >
> >>                      <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__**
> >> tech/tk389/tk214/tech___**digest09186a0080091a86.html<
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/__tech/tk389/tk214/tech___digest09186a0080091a86.html
> >
> >>        <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/**tech/tk389/tk214/tech_**
> >> digest09186a0080091a86.html<
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/tech_digest09186a0080091a86.html
> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>               "1000BASE-T works by using all four of the Category 5
> >>        pairs to
> >>               achieve 1000
> >>               Mbps operation over the installed Category 5 copper
> cabling.
> >>               1000 Mbps data
> >>               rates are achieved by sending and receiving a 250 Mbps
> data
> >>               stream over each
> >>               of the four pairs simultaneously (4 X 250 Mbps = 1 Gbps)."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>               Cheers,
> >>
> >>               -Aaron.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>               -----Original Message-----
> >>               From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>
> >>               [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>__] On
> >>
> >>               Behalf Of
> >>               Irfan Sid
> >>               Sent: Sunday, 31 July 2011 1:02 PM
> >>               To: Aaron Riemer
> >>               Cc: Carlos G Mendioroz; Cisco certification; Cisco
> >>        certification
> >>               Subject: Re: Packet delivery on a Ethernet Wire
> >>
> >>               So does that mean that in copper wire, you have two paths
> ie
> >>               full duplex,
> >>               one for transmit and one for recieve. One pair of the
> >>        copper will be
> >>               dedicated to tansmit and one to recieve. Each path
> >>        transmitting
> >>               serially.
> >>
> >>               On Fibre its the same, you have two fibre's one for
> >>        transmit and
> >>               one for
> >>               receive and data is transmitted serially on them.
> >>
> >>               Is this correct?
> >>
> >>               On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Aaron Riemer
> >>               <ariemer_at_amnet.net.au <mailto:ariemer_at_amnet.net.au>
> >>        <mailto:ariemer_at_amnet.net.au <mailto:ariemer_at_amnet.net.au>>**>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>                   My apologies. I must have misread.
> >>
> >>                   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_**___Data_transmission<
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/____Data_transmission>
> >>        <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**__Data_transmission<
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Data_transmission>
> >> >
> >>                   <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**__Data_transmission<
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Data_transmission>
> >>        <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Data_transmission<
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_transmission>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>                   Thanks for clearing that up.
> >>
> >>                   Cheers,
> >>
> >>                   -Aaron.
> >>
> >>                   -----Original Message-----
> >>                   From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com> <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>
> >>                   [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
> >>
> >>                   <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>__] On Behalf Of
> >>                   Carlos G Mendioroz
> >>                   Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 12:27 AM
> >>                   To: Aaron Riemer
> >>                   Cc: 'Irfan Sid'; 'Cisco certification'; 'Cisco
> >>        certification'
> >>                   Subject: Re: Packet delivery on a Ethernet Wire
> >>
> >>                   Aaron,
> >>                   copper has "pairs" because you use one wire as a
> >>        reference
> >>                   to the other.
> >>                   But there is only one signal path (each way), and it
> >>        works
> >>                   serially.
> >>                   -Carlos
> >>
> >>                   Aaron Riemer @ 27/7/2011 4:09 -0300 dixit:
> >>
> >>                       Hi Irfan,
> >>
> >>                       I believe with copper Ethernet (100BaseTX for
> >>        example)
> >>                       since there are
> >>                       copper "pairs" the data is sent in parallel. I
> would
> >>                       assume the only way
> >>                       parallel data transmission would work with fibre
> >>        is if a
> >>                       different band
> >>
> >>                   of
> >>
> >>                       light is used (CWDM for example).
> >>
> >>                       Queuing on the router/switch only affects packets
> >>        within
> >>                       the router
> >>
> >>                   itself
> >>
> >>                       and has no bearing on packets along the wire
> (unless
> >>                       they are dropped).
> >>
> >>                       Tools such as compression / LFI / DSCP marking are
> >>                       examples of the
> >>
> >>               router
> >>
> >>                       manipulating the packets in some way before
> >>        transmission
> >>                       out an
> >>
> >>                   interface.
> >>
> >>                       Cheers,
> >>
> >>                       -Aaron.
> >>
> >>
> >>                       -----Original Message-----
> >>                       From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
> >>                       <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>
> >>                       [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
> >>
> >>                       <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> >>        <mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com>**>__] On Behalf Of
> >>                       Irfan Sid
> >>                       Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2011 1:48 PM
> >>                       To: Cisco certification; Cisco certification
> >>                       Subject: Packet delivery on a Ethernet Wire
> >>
> >>                       This maybe a stupid question would appreciate if
> >>        someone
> >>                       can clearify:
> >>
> >>                       Are Ethernet packets delivered serially on the
> >>        physcial
> >>                       medium ie copper
> >>
> >>                   or
> >>
> >>                       fibre - one after another in one single file or
> >>        line if
> >>                       you will. Or are
> >>                       they delivered in parallel ie. two or more
> >>        packets can be in
> >>
> >>               transmission
> >>
> >>                       along each other in parallel.
> >>
> >>                       Also when you enable queueing on  Router/switch.
> >> Does
> >>                       this only effect
> >>
> >>                   the
> >>
> >>                       behaviour of how the router treats the packet on
> the
> >>                       inbound or outbound
> >>                       interface or does it also effect the behaviour of
> >> the
> >>                       packet when it is
> >>                       actually in transit on the wire itself.
> >>
> >>
> >>                       Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>                       <http://www.ccie.net/>
> >>
> >>                              ______________________________**
> >> ______________________________**___________________
> >>                       Subscription information may be found at:
> >>                       http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html
> <http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >
> >>                       <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                       Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>                       <http://www.ccie.net/>
> >>
> >>                              ______________________________**
> >> ______________________________**___________________
> >>                       Subscription information may be found at:
> >>                       http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html
> <http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >
> >>                       <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                   --
> >>                   Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> >>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> >>                   <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>>
> >>
> >>         LW7 EQI  Argentina
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                   Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>                   <http://www.ccie.net/>
> >>
> >>                          ______________________________**
> >> ______________________________**___________________
> >>                   Subscription information may be found at:
> >>                   http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >
> >>                   <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>               Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>               <http://www.ccie.net/>
> >>
> >>                      ______________________________**
> >> ______________________________**___________________
> >>               Subscription information may be found at:
> >>               http://www.groupstudy.com/____**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/____list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >
> >>               <http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>           --     Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> >>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> >>
> >>        <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>>
> >>            LW7 EQI  Argentina
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    --     Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:
> tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> >> >>
> >>
> >>     LW7 EQI  Argentina
> >>
> >>
> >>    Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >>    ______________________________**______________________________**
> >> _______________
> >>    Subscription information may be found at:
> >>    http://www.groupstudy.com/__**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html>
> >>    <http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Joe Astorino
> >> CCIE #24347
> >> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
> >>
> >> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
>
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- *Narbik Kocharians *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> Sr. Technical Instructor YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits! Training & Remote Racks available Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Jul 31 2011 - 12:45:16 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 01 2011 - 06:30:06 ART