Re: Using EIGRP Variance

Does the composite metric of the 2nd route not need to equal or better the admin distance of the preferred route for this to work, I could be wrong.

BR

Sent from my iPhone on 3

On 13 May 2012, at 16:24, "Shahid Mushtaq" <bxperts_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Forum,
>
>
>
> I am facing the issue with EIGRP Un-Equal cost load balancing. Even by using
> variance the link with low cost is not installed inside routing table.
>
>
>
> Below is the EIGRP topology table and the configuration.
>
>
>
> ================================
>
> R6#show ip eigrp topology 10.10.24.0 255.255.255.0
>
> IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 10.10.24.0/24
>
> State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 624896
>
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>
> 10.10.1.5 (FastEthernet0/0), from 10.10.1.5, Send flag is 0x0
>
> Composite metric is (624896/624896), Route is Internal
>
> Vector metric:
>
> Minimum bandwidth is 4096 Kbit
>
> Total delay is 3000 microseconds
>
> Reliability is 255/255
>
> Load is 1/255
>
> Minimum MTU is 1476
>
> Hop count is 2
>
> 10.10.1.3 (FastEthernet0/0), from 10.10.1.3, Send flag is 0x0
>
> Composite metric is (833280/833280), Route is Internal
>
> Vector metric:
>
> Minimum bandwidth is 3072 Kbit
>
> Total delay is 3000 microseconds
>
> Reliability is 255/255
>
> Load is 1/255
>
> Minimum MTU is 1500
>
> Hop count is 2
>
> ==========================================
>
> R6#sh run | s eigrp
>
> router eigrp 100
>
> variance 2
>
> network 10.10.1.1 0.0.0.0
>
> metric weights 0 1 0 0 0 0
>
> no auto-summary
>
> neighbor 10.10.1.5 FastEthernet0/0
>
> neighbor 10.10.1.3 FastEthernet0/0
>
> =========================================
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> Shahid
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 13 2012 - 19:51:47 ART